“December 6“ Babari Masjid True Story!

When start this problem?

1949 On December 23rd, Muslims finished their night prayer and left to their home. A shock was waiting for them, who came for fajr prayer. Inside the Mosque a mob kept Rama, Laxamana, Sita statues and claimed that their God took avatar (appeared) inside the mosque and they started agitating against innocent Muslims.

An FIR was filed at faizabad police station. Afterwards central and state government banned Muslims to conduct prayer inside the mosque and this became one of the important issue in Indian history.

Then Innocent Hindu's mind were brain-washed with hatred feeling against Muslims by spreading a false propaganda that "Babri Majid was built by demolishing Ram Temple"

If the propaganda of Saffron Group " Babri majid was built after demolishing Ram Temple" is true then no Muslims will fight for this issue. Because in Islam, demolishing other religious Temple is strictly prohibited. Due to their false claim about Ram Temple, Muslims are fighting to get back their mosque.

We don't want to divert the subject by exposing the comment of Chatterji, AK majumdhar, Nehru that RAM is an imaginary character.

Because the subject is to discuss by doing research whether any Ram temple exists in the disputed location ? Whether Majid was built in that location by demolishing Ram temple? Not about the existence of Ram or whether it is imaginary character or not!!!

Even Ram is an imaginary character; no Muslims will accept the demolition of Ram temple and build a mosque in that location.

Was Ram born at Ayodhya ?

We'll see how the claim of Ram born in that disputed location will be true.

Whatever the decision Hindus want to take, it should not be fundamentally taken from the comment of RSS or any other saffron organization. It should be taken from Hindus Vedas and Purunas. In fact, it would be opposite to Hindu ideology, if some decision taken apart from this jurisdiction of Vedas.

Valmiki wrote first about Ram and his words explained everything about Ram in crystal clear format. Valmiki explained in his Ramayana that he born at DHIREDHA Yuga.

A basic measurement unit of time, to denote the Hindu's belief of time is Yuga. There are four Yugas.

Kirudha yuga 17,28,000 ( 17 lakhs, 28 thousands ) years

Dhiredha Yuga 12,96,000 ( 12 lakhs, 96 thousand) years

Duvaba Yuga 8,64,000 ( 8 lakhs, 64 thousand ) years

Kali Yuga 4,32,000 ( 4 lakhs, 32 thousand ) years

Now we are living in the time of Kali Yuga. Kali Yuga starts before 3102 years of Christ. Now 2009 finished after Christ. So 5110 years finished after kali yuga starts.

Duvaba yuga was before Kali Yuga and Ram didn't born during this time. Before this was Dhiredha Yuga and even Ram born during last stage of this Yuga and according to Valmiki Ramayana's Judgment " Ram should have born before 8,69,110 years ( 8,64,000 + 5110 )

Like Valmiki Ramayana told about Ram's Yuga, he specified the birth place too that is "He born at Ayodhya city "

That means " Ayodhya" should exists before 8 Lakhs, 64 thousand years. A report was submitted on 1976, 77 by central government archeological department regarding " when Ayodhya appeared?". This report in its 52, 53 page explained that "A place name called Ayodhya in which people started dwelling was before 700 BC.

That means, before 2708 years, there would be no Ayodhya according to their archeological research.

Afterwards this was re-researched by C.P.Lal and K.N Theetjit , a notable historian. They also found that it was true whatever the archeological department found.

Valmiki told that Ram born before 8 lakhs 69 thousand years at Ayodhya, but it is crystal clear that there was nothing called Ayodhya at that time.

How Hindus can conclude by neglecting Ramayana and archeological finding?

The age of this Ayodhya is 2708 years. But this is not the one explained by Ramayana. May be it is in different place. It is general to find many places in the same name. By considering these facts, they have to come for conclusion, which will not contradict with Ramayana and research facts.

There is lot of testimonials in Ramayana that Ram born at Ayodhya which is different from the existing one.

While speaking about Ayodhya, Ramayana spoke about Sarayu River. Sarayu River exists 1.5 yojan distances from Ayodhya. (1.5 yojan means 23 kilometers )

Even though there's one river called Sarayu at Ayodhya, it's running inside the city, not 23 kilometers away from the city.

That means, Ayodhya and Sarayu River told by Ramayana is not the existing one. Ramayana teachings will be correct when you believe Sarayu River flows 23 kilometers away from Ayodhya.

People are simply neglecting Hinduism, if they consider existing Ayodhya is same like Ayodhya explained in Ramayana.

Also Valmiki Ramayana explains that " Sarayu River join with Ganga". But this Sarayu River mingles with Raabthi River. What we learnt from this? Ramayana doesn't denote this Ayodhya and Sarayu river. Also Valmiki Ramaya explains Sarayu river flows from east to west. But Sarayu river in UP flow from west to east.

A researcher, Saer Singh Identified a truth. There is one Ayodhya at Nepal. 20 kilometers away from that city one river is flowing from east to west. Also it mingles with Ganga.

So, those who believe Ram born at Ayodhya, which is at Uttarpradesh, are neglecting Ramayana and its ideology.

Real Ayodhya should be one, which was explained by the Ramayana with all testimonials.

was Ram temple existed at Ayodhya ?

Babar Majid was build at 1528. We'll see whether any truth present with the opinion of " Mir Baahi" a minister of Baber, who was accused for demolishing Ram Temple in the disputed location"

RSS claimed that Ram temple was built by king Vikramathithya. Vikramathidya is general name like Chola,Pandya kings. Chandra Gupta, samutra Gupta kings are called in the name of Vikramathidya.

They contradict in specifying the actual king who really built the Ram temple. There is not fact in their claim.

Gupta kings ruled some part of U.P during the period 300 AD to 1100 AD. These kings who ruled for 800 years are called as Vikramathidya.

During the period 300 AD to 1100 AD, there was not even a smell of human at Ayodhya, according to the chief of Indian Archeological department.

P.P Lal who submitted research report and was published at famous magazines" The Week" (25.02.1990) and "Sunday Times" (20.11.1987 ). In that report, after showing several evidences, he was confidently explained that, at Ayodhya during that period of 300 – 1100 AD, there was no human, building, temple or anything.

In some place, which is untouched by human, how can they build a temple? How Baber can demolish a temple which was not existed? I request Hindu Brothers and sisters to think about this.

When Ram was worshipped as God?

If temple to be built for Ram, it should be built after Ram was worshipped as God. Now Hindus are worshiping Ram as God, but they didn't do it before. Ram was not considered as God, Especially during the period of 300-1100 AD, which was claimed by RSS, the time when Ram temple was built.

Amar Simha of AD 600, released many Sanskrit Poetry resources in the name of " Amara Kosa". In that, those who are worshipped as God in India were specified. Ram name was not in the list. So Hindus during that period were not considering Ram as GOD's Avatar and its considered as big testimonial.

A Sadhu called Lakhsmidhar, collected the information of all sacred place up to 11th century (until last time of Gupta Dynasty). Ayodhya Ram temple is not existed in that.

If Ram temple was build during Gupta period, why it was not included in the list of sacred place?

Same like that, S.S.Iyer , a notable research scholar, published book called " Indian Temples, Historic notes". He didn't specify anything about Ram temple. He noted five temples which was built by Vikramathidya. Ayodhya Ram temple is not there.

At 1989 November 12, IAS officer Ramachandra Kadri wrote one article at "Radiance". He referred so many evidences with Encyclopedia like Britannica and comment that only after 1100 AD, Ram was worshipped as God.

That means, until the last period of Gupta kings, Ram was not worshipped as God. Can any Hindu who has real conscience, believe that Ram temple was build during the Gupta period?

If we want to tell more clearly, Valmiki wrote Ramayana in Sanskrit. Sanskrit was not popularly spoken by all people and only Brahmins knew about that. Because of this Ram was not considered as God.

Valmiki Ramayana was translated and released in Hindi by Tulsi Das. After that, Ramayana was very famous among people. After Tulsi Das translated Ramayana in Hindi, people start considering Ram as God's Avatar.

What's the time of Tulsi Das ? Tulsi Das Lived during the period of Baber (in Ayodhya ), which was claimed for demolition of Ram temple. Baber ruled during 1500 AD and Tulsi was living under that rule.

Ramayana was translated in Hindi during the rule of Baber and that time Ram was not considered as God. So it becomes true that Hindu people didn't have any knowledge about him.

How Ram was worshiped as GOD when Ramayana was not spread across people? How temple was build for him? Dear Hindu Brothers and sisters, think about this.

India's first president was Dr. Radha Krishnan. His son Gopal who was good Hindu devotee and very good research scholar too. In his research article, he proclaimed that "There was no temple for Ram before 1750 AD, in any part of India. He confidently declared that "All Ram temple belongs to 18th century".

if Ram temple was not existed before 200 years, how Baber demolish Ram temple at Disputed location of Ayodhya. I request every citizen, to think about this.

The truth is, the foundation of Babri Majid was laid by Ibrahim Lodi, on 1524. He was unable to continue the service for long time and he was killed in war by Baber. Then, Baber build a Majid, with the foundation laid by Ibrahim Lodi. So it is untrue to tell that Baber demolished the temple.

Will Baber Demolish temple ?

So far, the evidences provided here is enough for everyone, who can really able to distinguish between good and bad. For debate purpose, even though if any temple was there in the disputed location, Baber would not demolish that.

Because, in same Ayothya, for five temples like Hunumangiri ,Jenmasthan, Baber provided incentives by writing in brass . This been safeguarded still now by temple management and was reiterated with evidences by Ramrasha Thiribathi.

How a person will demolish a temple, who provided incentives to many temples?

Also the population of Muslims during Baber reign would be meager when compared with present population. Sovereignty of the kingdom will be maintained only by the support of majority Hindus. Baber would be thrown-out from his throne, by agitators of Hindu Majority, if their temple was demolished. No king will be involved in such activities, if he really wants to retain his power.

Hindus during that time were not involved in any riots or agitation, but only welcomed all Mughal heirs like Babar, his son Humayun, his son Akbar. This shows the courtesy and kindness were showered by Mughal emperors towards Hindu majority.

During the last time of Baber, he wrote one WILL to his son Humayun written in Persian language and it is been preserved still today at Central government's National museum at Delhi. In that he gave advise as "Dear son, you are going to rule a country where Hindus are in majority. They are respecting COW as God. So don't eat Cow's meat (Beef) at any instance.

How a Good Citizen can believe that Baber demolished a temple, who advised his son to renounce the eating habit of Cow's meat (beef)?

Guru Nanak who founded Sikh religion was considered as big enemy during Baber's reign. He rigorously opposed Baber, especially for the issues related with women. If Baber demolished the temple, he would have indicated that with his strong resentment. But history commenting that he went to Ayodhya and enjoyed the beauty of Babri Majid's Structure.

Person like him who lived in those years only knew that whether Baber constructed Majid by demolishing temple. In such case, he would never enjoy its building structure.

Some falsely imagine and claim that people didn't oppose the rule because of Babar's tyrant nature.

Baber was neither hated by Hindu people nor was he was a tyrant king. This is the truth. For debate purpose, if we consider Baber was a tyrant king, it would not be true.

After Baber, his kingdom was ruled by his son Humayun. After 25 years of Baber's death, his grandson Akbar ruled the kingdom. He gave up Islam and was following New Religion Din-ilahi, for which he was the founder. Akbar was like a Hindu king and even he got appreciation from many saffron organizations.

If Baber demolished the temple, it should have been noticed by many people who lived during the period of Akbar too. They don't need to worry about Akbar and they would have asked to rebuild the temple which was demolished by his grandfather. Surely, Akbar would have satisfied such people, if his grandfather would have demolished such structure. People could have requested, only if temple was demolished!!! But there happened no such incidents.

We'll leave that. Even after the Mughals era was ended by Britishers, this issue was not raised by anyone until 1948. There was no case registered too.

In 200 years rule of British:

No case was registered during British rule against the demolition of mosque and nobody requested British government to get back their temple.

Problem suddenly rose to its full vigor only after December 23, 1949, when a mob placed Ram idol inside the mosque.

In Ayodhya there are more than 30 Temples which manifest about Ram's birth place. Hindu scholars identified many places as Ram's birth place and they didn't include Babri Majid among them.

This was the reality, until saffron group diverted the attention of Hindus by such false claims.

Saffron Group discovered that by evoking extreme hatred among Hindus and Muslims, they can capture the opportunity to rule India from Congress. Finally they captured the rule by cheating innocent Hindu citizens who believe that" All the glitters are Gold ".

Dear Hindu Brothers and Sisters!!!

We'll strive to preserve the UNITY.

We'll neglect communal forces, which have vested interest in creating extreme friction to the development of our country.

We'll work hard for the economic development of our country and for its prosperous future.

-English Translation  A

nis Rahman 

via TNTJ website

Read More

WHO KILLED HEMANT KARKARE?

Photo of female Hindu 'terrorist' Pragya Thakur (centre in yellow), who was allegedly trained at India's Bhosla Military School. (http://specials.rediff.com/news/2008/nov/04sld1.htm)


On 15 december 2008, at Samar magazine, the editorial was entitled: Who Killed Hemant Karkare?

Among the points made:

1. In India, a thorough professional probe was being carried out into a terror network involving Hindu extremist organisations and people linked to the Indian security services.

The lead investigator was Hemant Karkare, Chief of the Maharasthra Anti-Terrorism Squad, whose office was in the centre of Mumbai.

Karkare and two of his colleagues were killed during the Mumbai attacks of November 2008.

Karkare

2. Hemant Karkare "was unearthing a terror network unlike any that has been seen thus far."

The investigation started by tracing the motorcycle used to plant bombs in Malegaon, North East of Mumbai, in September 2006.

The motorcycle was traced to a Hindu nun called Pragyasingh Thakur.

Reportedly, the man who planted the bombs was Ramji.

Thakur, in a cellphone conversation with Ramji, asked why more people had not been killed.

Lt Col Srikant Purohit of Indian military intelligence

3. Karkare's team discovered that Lt.Col. Srikant Purohit, of Indian military intelligence, had got 60 kg of RDX explosive from government supplies for use in the terrorist attack on the Samjhauta Express train in February 2007.

In this attack, 68 people were killed.

Lashkar-e-Taiba and other Islamist groups had originally been accused of carrying out the attack.

Photo of Samjhauta Express from http://www.arf-asia.org/amana/prod/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=34&Itemid=69


4. The Chief Minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi (a Hindu), and BJP Prime Ministerial candidate, L.K.Advani (a Hindu) accused Karkare of being a 'desh drohi' or traitor, "a charge that in India carries a death penalty".

The Shiv Sena (Hindu group) offered legal aid to those accused of the terrorist attack.

On November 26, just before the Mumbai 'terrorist' attack, the police in Pune received a call from an anonymous caller saying in Marathi that Karkare would be killed in a bomb blast within two or three days.

Karkare

5. Assistant Police Inspector Sachin Vaze was one of those who disliked Karakare.

Vaze, a member of Hindu nationalist group Shiv Sena, together with three colleagues, was charged with murder, criminal conspiracy, destruction of evidence and concealment of a dead body in the case of Khwaja Yunus shortly before the terrorist attack.

(Bombay police stage-managed his "encounter", The Milli Gazette.)

Vaze had been dismissed for corruption, extortion and links with the underworld.



6. The death of Karkare.

The earliest reports, presumably from the police, said that Karkare had been killed at the Taj.

In the early hours of the 27th, IBNlive showed footage of a shootout at the Metro cinema , where an unconscious man who looks like Karkare and wearing the same light blue shirt and dark trousers (but without any blood on his shirt or the terrible wounds we saw on his face at his funeral) is being pulled into a car by two youths in saffron shirts.

The commentary reports that there were two vehicles, a Toyota Qualis and Honda City, from which the occupants were firing indiscriminately.

Later we were given two accounts of the killings where the venue is shifted to a deserted lane without cameras or eye-witnesses.

The first account is by 'arrested gunman' Ajmal Amir Kasab.

According to Kasab, just two gunmen, he and Ismail, went to Cama, a government hospital for women and children used mainly by the poor.

Initially, according to the police, Kasab claimed he and Ismail had killed Karkare, Salaskar and Kamte.

Later, in his confession, he claimed that while coming out of the hospital, he and Ismail saw a vehicle stop some distance away. A police officer got out and started firing at them, hitting Kasab on the hand so that he dropped his AK47, but Ismail opened fire on the officers in the car until they stopped firing. There were three bodies in the vehicle, which Ismail removed, and then drove off in it with Kasab.

The other account is by police constable Arun Jadhav.

According to him, Karkare, Salaskar, Kamte, a driver and four police constables including himself were driving down the alley from Victoria Terminus to the back entrance of Cama (barely a ten-minute drive) in their Toyota Qualis to check on injured police officer Sadanand Date when two gunmen emerged from behind trees by the left side of the road and sprayed the vehicle with bullets, killing all its passengers except Jadhav.

They then dragged out the three officers, hijacked the vehicle, drove to Metro junction and then Mantralaya in South Bombay, abandoned it when a tyre burst, and grabbed another car. According to police accounts, they then drove to Girgaum, where Kasab was injured and arrested and his companion killed.

7. Kasab claimed that a band of ten terrorists landed and split up into two's, going to various destinations, he and his companion going to VT.

He said they wanted to blow up the Taj, as in the attack on the Marriott in Islamabad; yet we are told that only 8kg of RDX were found at the Taj, and even that was not used; contrast this with 600kg of RDX and TNT used to blow up the Marriott: could they really have expected to blow up the Taj?

Taj Hotel By Joe Zachs. Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/joezach/

8. How did the invaders from the sea get one bomb to go off in Dockyard Road and another in Vile Parle, 25 kilometres away?

9. Kasab said that the terrorists planned to use their hostages as a means of escape, yet there was no attempt at any such negotiations; at other times, he also said they had been instructed to fight to the death.

10. Kasab says he is a labourer from Faridkot near Multan and only studied up to Class IV, but it is reported that he speaks fluent English.

11. Several people have pointed out that the pictures of him in VT show him wearing a saffron wrist-band, a Hindu custom, and police later revealed that he could not recite a single verse from the Koran, which any child growing up in a Muslim family would have been able to do.

12. An article on the soc.culture.jewish group argued that none of the terrorists were Muslims, given their appearance and behaviour (especially their reported consumption of alcohol and drugs), pointing out that they did not need to disguise themselves, since Muslims who look like Muslims are plentiful in Bombay, and would not attract undue attention.

Kasab

13. During his interrogation, Kasab said that he and eight of the operatives had done a reconnaissance trip to Bombay a few months back, pretending to be students and renting a room at Colaba market, which is close to Nariman House.

It is extremely hard for Pakistani nationals to get Indian visas, and they are kept under close surveillance by the police; it is also most unlikely that the Indian immigration authorities would be fooled by forged passports of another country. In that case, the Indian immigration authorities would have visa applications of nine of the terrorists including Kasab, and could match the photographs in them to those of the terrorists: has this been done?

Later, Kasab changed his mind and said that the team who carried out reconnaisance was different from the team who had carried out the attacks.

14. According to witnesses, two gunmen started firing at the mainline terminus in VT at 21:55 on Wednesday night, but at precisely the same time, according to CCTV footage, two gunmen began an assault on the suburban terminus. If the first account is true, there were four gunmen at the station: where did the other two come from, and where did they go?

15. We are shown video footage, claiming to be CCTV but without the timeline of normal CCTV footage, of Kasab and Ismail wandering around the parking lot near the mainline terminus.

This surely cannot be before the shootout, since the station is completely deserted.

And after the shootout, Kasab and Ismail are supposed to have escaped via the footbridge from Platform 1 of the suburban station on the other side of VT: this, again, suggests there were four gunmen.

16. Even if Kasab and Ismail had been shown photographs of Karkare, Salaskar and Kamte before they embarked on their trip, how could they possibly have identified the police officers in a dark alley in the dead of night according to Kasab's first story? According to his later confession, a police officer got out of the vehicle and started firing first, injuring him.

How, then, did Ismail manage to kill the rest by himself?

17. Witnesses in Cama hospital say the terrorists spoke fluent Marathi (the language spoken around Bombay), and this report has been confirmed.

The gunmen appear to have made a beeline for the 6th floor (which was empty) and the terrace.

Was it because they would have a direct view of the lane in which Karkare, Salaskar and Kamte were later supposedly killed?

18. In his first account, the policeman called Jadhav said Karkare was in the second row of the Qualis vehicle, while in the second account he was supposed to be in the front row with Kamte.

In the second account, Salaskar was initially sitting behind the driver, but then asked the driver to slow down and got behind the wheel himself: is it plausible that an experienced encounter specialist would deliberately make himself into a sitting duck like this when they were in hot pursuit of terrorists?

In the first account they were supposed to be going to check up on their injured colleague Sadanand Date, but in the second were supposed to be looking for a red car in which they had been told the gunmen were traveling.

If the report about the red car was a decoy to lure them into an ambush, it is important to know who told them that the terrorists were in a red car.

If the gunmen were firing from the left side, as Jadhav claimed, how was Karkare hit three times in the chest while Jadhav himself got two bullets in his right arm?

In fact, the only vegetation in that part of the lane is on the right side and has wire netting around it; it would be necessary to climb over the netting to hide behind it, and climb over again to come out: impossible under the circumstances.

Witnesses say only two bodies were found at the spot next morning: what happened to the third officer? Who were the three constables killed?

How did two terrorists manage to kill six police personnel, including Karkare and Kamte who he said were armed with AK47s and Salaskar, an encounter specialist, when one terrorist was later captured and the other killed by policemen armed only with two rifles and lathis? Assistant Police Inspector Ombale was killed in that encounter, but his colleagues survived.

19. There was also an intriguing report in DNA on 28 November saying that Anand Raorane, a resident of a building opposite Nariman House, heard sounds of celebration from the terrorists there when the news of Karkare getting killed was flashed on TV: isn't that strange?

The same report quoted a resident of Nariman House and a local shopkeeper who said that the terrorists had purchased large quantities of food and liquor before the attack, suggesting that more than two of them were planning to occupy the place for a long time.

20. Another DNA report, on 2 December, said that sub-inspector Durgude, who had been posted in front of St Xavier's College, between Cama Hospital and the exit point of the back lane onto Mahapalika Road, saw two young men whom he took to be students and called out to warn them that there was firing at Cama. When they ignored him, he approached them, upon which one of them turned an AK47 on him and killed him.

If Kasab and Ismail were there, who was firing inside Cama? Eye-witnesses in St Xavier's saw a man shot and lying on the pavement in front of the college around 12.30 a.m., while about three gunmen stood over him: who was that?

21. Various reports said that two to eight terrorists were captured alive. Now there is only one in police custody: what happened to the other(s)?

22. "A careful scrutiny of all the reports available so far suggests, to this writer anyway, that the killing of Karkare and his colleagues was a premeditated act, executed by a group that had stationed gunmen at various points along the general route between VT and the Metro cinema with a view to maximising their chances of a successful murderous assault.

"We have too much bitter experience of investigations in which innocent people (usually Muslim youth) are rounded up, tortured and even killed, while the real culprits are allowed to go free. Karkare broke with this dismal record, but now he is dead.

"When a person who has been vilified, slandered and threatened with death is killed in suspicious circumstances, it is imperative that a proper investigation should be carried out soon, before too much evidence can be manufactured and/or destroyed.

"If Kasab aka Iman disappears or is assassinated like Lee Harvey Oswald, or is executed, that would be further evidence of a conspiracy."

Read More

Beautiful Du'aas from the Holy Quran

when My servants ask thee concerning Me, I am indeed close (to them): I respond to the dua (prayer) of every suppliant when they calleth on Me - Quran 2:186)

1. Our Lord! Grant us good in this world and good in the life to come and keep us safe from the torment of the Fire (2:201)

2. Our Lord! Bestow on us endurance and make our foothold sure and give us help against those who reject faith. (2:250)

3. Our Lord! Take us not to task if we forget or fall into error. (2:286)

4. Our Lord! Lay not upon us such a burden as You did lay upon those before us. (2:286)

5. Our Lord! Impose not on us that which we have not the strength to bear, grant us forgiveness and have mercy on us. You are our Protector. Help us against those who deny the truth. (2:286)

6. Our Lord! Let not our hearts deviate from the truth after You have guided us, and bestow upon us mercy from Your grace. Verily You are the Giver of bounties without measure. (3:8)

7. Our Lord! Forgive us our sins and the lack of moderation in our doings, and make firm our steps and succour us against those who deny the truth. (3:147)

8. Our Lord! Whomsoever You shall commit to the Fire, truly You have brought [him] to disgrace, and never will wrongdoers find any helpers (3:192)

9. Our Lord! Behold we have heard a voice calling us unto faith: "Believe in your Lord" and we have believed. (3:193)

10. Our Lord! Forgive us our sins and efface our bad deeds and take our souls in the company of the righteous. (3:193)

11. Our Lord! And grant us that which you have promised to us by Your messengers and save us from shame on the Day of Judgement. Verily You never fail to fulfill Your promise. (3:194)

12. Our Lord! We have sinned against ourselves, and unless You grant us forgiveness and bestow Your mercy upon us, we shall most certainly be lost! (7:23)

13. Our Lord! Place us not among the people who have been guilty of evildoing. (7:47)

14. Our Lord! Lay open the truth between us and our people, for You are the best of all to lay open the truth. (7:89)

15. Our Lord! Pour out on us patience and constancy, and make us die as those who have surrendered themselves unto You. (7:126)

16. Our Lord! Make us not a trial for the evildoing folk, and save as by Your mercy from people who deny the truth (10:85-86)

17. Our Lord! You truly know all that we may hide [in our hearts] as well as all that we bring into the open, for nothing whatever, be it on earth or in heaven, remains hidden from Allah (14:38)

18. Our Lord! Bestow on us mercy from Your presence and dispose of our affairs for us in the right way. (18:10)

19. Our Lord! Grant that our spouses and our offspring be a comfort to our eyes, and give us the grace to lead those who are conscious of You. (25:74)

20. Our Lord! You embrace all things within Your Grace and Knowledge, forgive those who repent and follow Your path, and ward off from them the punishment of Hell. (40:7)

21. Our Lord! Make them enter the Garden of Eden which You have promised to them, and to the righteous from among their fathers, their wives and their offspring, for verily You are alone the Almighty and the truly Wise. (40:8)

22. Our Lord! Relieve us of the torment, for we do really believe. (44:12)

23. Our Lord! Forgive us our sins as well as those of our brethren who proceeded us in faith and let not our hearts entertain any unworthy thoughts or feelings against [any of] those who have believed. Our Lord! You are indeed full of kindness and Most Merciful (59:10)

24. Our Lord! In You we have placed our trust, and to You do we turn in repentance, for unto You is the end of all journeys. (60:4)

25. Our Lord! Perfect our light for us and forgive us our sins, for verily You have power over all things. (66:8)

Read More

International 'Burn a Quran Day' on 9th anniversary of /11

CNN: Non-denominational church in Gainesville Florida,USA plans to host an international 'Burn a Quran Day' on 9th anniversary of /11,from 6 to 9pm at church.Here we muslims need to be united and protest against this until they decide to cancel this event.Every muslim is requested to spread this message among muslims all over this world.So don't delay and take action immediately.

................................
(CNN) -- In protest of what it calls a religion "of the devil," a nondenominational church in Gainesville, Florida, plans to host an "International Burn a Quran Day" on the ninth anniversary of the September 11, 2001, attacks.


The Dove World Outreach Center says it is hosting the event to remember 9/11 victims and take a stand against Islam. With promotions on its website and Facebook page, it invites Christians to burn the Muslim holy book at the church from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m.

"We believe that Islam is of the devil, that it's causing billions of people to go to hell, it is a deceptive religion, it is a violent religion and that is proven many, many times," Pastor Terry Jones told CNN's Rick Sanchez earlier this week.

Jones wrote a book titled "Islam is of the Devil," and the church sells coffee mugs and shirts featuring the phrase.

Muslims and many other Christians -- including some evangelicals -- are fighting the initiative.

The church launched a YouTube channel to disseminate its messages.

"I mean ask yourself, have you ever really seen a really happy Muslim? As they're on the way to Mecca? As they gather together in the mosque on the floor? Does it look like a real religion of joy?" Jones asks in one of his YouTube posts.

"No, to me it looks like a religion of the devil."

The Islamic advocacy group Council on American-Islamic Relations called on Muslims and others to host "Share the Quran" dinners to educate the public during the monthlong fast of Ramadan beginning in August. In a news release, the group announced a campaign to give out 100,000 copies of the Quran to local, state and national leaders.

"American Muslims and other people of conscience should support positive educational efforts to prevent the spread of Islamophobia," said CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper in the release.

The National Association of Evangelicals, the nation's largest umbrella evangelical group, issued a statement urging the church to cancel the event, warning it could cause worldwide tension between the two religions.

"The NAE calls on its members to cultivate relationships of trust and respect with our neighbors of other faiths. God created human beings in his image, and therefore all should be treated with dignity and respect," it said in the statement.

Dove's Facebook page, set up for the September event, has more than 1,600 fans.

"Eternal fire is the only destination the Quran can lead people to, so we want to put the Quran in it's [sic] place -- the fire!" the page says.

But another Facebook group with more than 3,100 fans says it stands "against the disrespect and intolerance that these people have for the Muslim people" and encourages people to report Dove's page to Facebook.

Targeting another group it calls "godless," the Dove center is also hosting a protest against Gainesville Mayor Craig Lowe, who is openly gay, on Monday at Gainesville's City Hall. The group previously fought -- unsuccessfully -- to derail Lowe's election campaign.

"We protest sexual perversion because the Bible protests it. ... What is acceptable to today's leadership becomes acceptable to tomorrow's society," the church says in its blog entry about the event.

Lowe and other government figures and media outlets received e-mails from the church about the event, The Gainesville Sun reported. Lowe isn't concerned with Monday's event.

"I've got other things to do," he said, The Sun reports.

On the outreach center's front lawn, alongside a sign reading "Aug. 2 Protest, No Homo Mayor, City Hall," stands not just one, but three signs bearing the slogan "Islam is of the Devil."

One of the signs -- one reading "Islam" on one side, "Devil" on the other -- was vandalized. On its blog last week, the church said the sign will be replaced.

"This is private property and vandalism is a crime here in America," the blog says. "In Islam, many actions that we consider to be crimes are encouraged, condoned or sheltered under Islamic teaching and practice, though. Another reason to burn a Quran."

via CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/07/29/florida.burn.quran.day/index.html  
 
 

Read More

FAKE MIRACLE :: Flying Dome of Mosque in Nepal !

Please read whole article here which explain what happening in that fake miracle

FAKE MIRACLE :: Flying Dome of Mosque in Nepal !

Assalam Alaykum,
Praise be to Allah swt,
Today i'm going to discuss about this claimed miracle associated to Allah SWT.
Thanks to Allah Swt for helping me,indeed all praise be to Allah,without his help,i was not able to do any thing.
Through the Internet we often receive an email that talks about 'evidence of Allah's greatness or miracle of Islam' or 'miracles of Allah' without any proof, Usually, the news are in the form of a surprising: the form of images or natural events that are 'strange' or unusual that muslims believe on it…
but before we trust on such pictures or contents …i want to ask you

1. Have we ever inquired or questioned the authenticity of such images when you recieve in email,or see in facebook pages/ gallery?
2. Honestly, do we need to proof the truth of Islam or the greatness of Allah this way?

What ever im going to say here is result of my research done for the claimed Miracle know as Dome Flying Mosque in Nepal.

MIRACLE

These days on internet there is a very popular video,saying Allah help in  Mosque in nepal or Flying dome of Mosque in Nepal some saying in Indonecia.

THE VIDEO :

THE BIG QUESTION IS , IS IT REALLY MIRACLE OF ALLAH SWT ????? OR JUST LIE….?????? Lets Analyse the Video.

{My First View and Reason to do this}

I saw this video approx 1 yr before,but i ignored it…becoz it was not very popular,but today im exposing this becoz now this lie is spreading like a fire,among muslims,from desktop to mobile.Every where.
There are many Brother and Sisters who believes on this video.and they are busy in  sharing with others, without thinking twice What if this is FAKE?
They forgot that its unauthorized content,having no proof,
before sharing you must verify the info,if you are not doing,you will be held responsible in the court of Allah SWT for whatever you have said or done.
Unfortunately, many brother and sisters DO not care for this ,in order to save my brother and sisters from gaining bad deeds i'm exposing the facts of this claimed miracle! Since there is hadith which says

What ever i wish for my self,i must wish same for other brother and sisters,
I wish Jannah for my self,and want the same for others too…

My Belief on Miracles :

Please note that im fully aware of greatness of Allah Swt,i'm not here to challenge the power of ALLAH SWT .
I also know that when ever Allah swt want to do any thing,
He the most High just have to say "be" and It is….

The Originator of the heavens and the earth, Allah Almighty, When He decreeth a thing, He says unto it only: Be! and it is. Surah Al-baqarah : 117

There are many miracles,which generally peoples IGNORE.
Is not DNA a Miracle ?
Are the Sun and Moon not Miracles ?
Is not growth of Plant is Miracle..?
Is not DEATH is Miracle ?
IS not Firaun Dead Body is a Miracle ?
IS not Quran a Miracle ?
I truly and 100% beliefs in the Miracles of Allah SWT and His Greatness.
but i can't accept fake ,un authorised contents as his miracles .
here my motive is  to bring truth in front of you and stop brothers and sisters  for spreading wrong informations by which they are gaining sins with/without knowledge.

{ Different stories with this Video }

story 1
There was a new mosque or masjid in Malibu Island that was still under construction however had no crane to lift and transfer the dome from the old masjid to the new masjid.
So about 3000 alims gathered nearthe masjid to do zikirullah.
With ALLAH's help, the dome was lifted and trasferred by just their zikir.
It was also told that these alims had did fasting for 3 days and did qiyammulai for 3 nights prior to the dome lifting.


story 2
Incident took place in nepal where the local people were building a masjid. They were worried about the dome to be placed over the minaret as they dint had any crane facility so they decided to call for allah's help as they started to make dua and ask for help from allah the dome was placed on the minaret in a miraculous way. subhan allah


story 3


ALLAHU AKBAR! Yes it's miracle of "ALLAH". Happend in Nepal. Govt didnt allowed the crane for Mosque minar and said that `go and ask your ALLAH to help you.  Allah helps muslim by putting gunbad on menar without any support, since, non muslims dont allow muslims to use crane to lift gunbad, so the imam of mosque saw our beloved prophet pbuh in dream who told him just cover the gunbad with white bed sheet and then see.


story 4


It was in Ternate, Indonesia, and the dome was about to be placed on top of a mosquetower, suddenly it flew by itself and landed on top of the tower where it supposed to be placed. Subhanallah..


story 5


he attached video clip was received from a friend of mine.  This incident happened early this year (2008) in a remote Island of Malibu (Indonesia). Anew mosque was built in a village on that island of Malibu. Unfortunately the villagers do not have a Heavy Duty Crane to uplift the Dome from the old mosque to the newly built Mosque's Minaret.
About 3000 Imaams gathered in the mosque to perform Dhikirullah. With Allah's Rahmah, the Dome from the old mosque was lifted up to the new mosque's Minaret with the power of Dhikirullah.
According to the person who recorded this clip, all the Imaams have fasted for 3 days and did Qiamullayl and have pleaded for Allah s.w.t Mercy for this 3 days prior to performing the Dhikirullah and lifting the Dome.
It was reported that many of the people there became hysteria upon seeing this incident.
This event proves us the strength of one's Imaan, Dhikirullah and Taqwa. May Allah s.w.t strengthens our Imaan and be good Muslims. Ameen………!!!!!


story 6


ASSALAAM U ALAIKUM WA REHMAT ULLAH
{ this incident of dome is exactly 100 % true } { and more over this miracle had been seen by thousand's of muslim's andnon muslim's } { as the imaam of this mosque has not enough money for hanging this dome upside of the mosque well then collecting some money from some muslim brother's but it was not enough amount demanded by the christian constructor well they all went to the constructor and asked him to lift up the dome at the top of the mosque but they haven't that much amount as demanded they have some of them and they said please accept this amount and take it and continue your work .it's our request and then the christian constructor smiled and said '" ask from your allah and muhammad to lift up the dome " { and then they all went back to their homes .
The imam of this masjid was in a great tension and he went to sleep and in his dream's he saw the personalities of personalities { hazrat muhammad sal lal laa hu alaihee walee hee wassalaam }
{ and hazrat muhammad said to the imam of masjid " place the white cloth on the dome and the dome will lift it self at the top of the mosque "}
{ and at morning they all place the white cloth on the dome according to my muhammad sal lal hu alaihee wassallam said } and then the miracle's of miracle of my allah happened in front of thousand's of people the dome itself lift's up to it's place and the dome is placed right at the top of the mosque subhan allah }
{ allah u akbar}
{must watch,read and share it with your muslim brother's and sister's}
{ regard's muslim}

*************************************
Interesting stories indeed,such stories that a muslim will believe it

but with the help from Allah i found that this MIRACLE IS COMPLETELY FAKE. ALL THE ABOVE EXPLAINED STORIES ARE BASELESS PACK OF LIE.
from the very first day i didn;t believed on video and i knew that its Fake miracle,Alhamdulilah my guess and thoughts were right and with the help from Allah I'm going to present the truth in front of you.

YES,THIS VIDEO IS NOT MIRACLE,FAKE CLAIMED MIRACLE…ASSOCIATED TO ALLAH SWT.

{the mosque place}

If you see a glimpse of flight recordings dome mosque in Kailolo village in Central Maluku, 25 km from Ambon, was enough to make us wonder. Because the dome is supposedly preached that weighs thousands of pounds, can fly without the aid of floating devices floating around in space .

The News agency part from video proofs that its from Indonesia..not NEPAL. NEPAL PART IS LIE.

{the real story}

The dome is said to be floating, while it is lifted using the cable, pull cable to raise the dome of the mosque used since time immemorial without using a crane with a system of Pulleys.
The dome is moving to top like cable car movement.

{Why you can't see cable}

The Camera used for this capture was bad camera,not good resolution…this much bad that it cant show the wires on Electric pole.. see here

{How to Determine Cable?}

use math, angle, view angle every time the dome of the wind and you will be able to axis. If you see the panorama shows a white line along the lines indicated.
there is a subtle white wire with the clouds, so in our eyes, the wire is not visible becoz background is also white.

In areas that have been illuminated by it, there were three stretch of the rope that supported the dome.

In areas that have been illuminated by it, there were three stretch of the rope that supported the dome.

Here, more clearly visible. Second stretch of rope seen against the background of a contrasting tile house.

{Now watch the Cable on  TOP}

The cable is not clearly visible due to white background.but still some traces are there!

IN SMALL VIEW

{ Supporting Cable}

In this Entire Process there are 3 Wires supporting this DOME MOVEMENT…:) look above pic…!

If not,then what is the use of there ropes/wires…? Indeed to pull the wire so that the dome go on top.

Conclusion :

In conclusion, the dome is not flying, but being pulled by a rope. Only the perception of society that makes the dome fly.
The Above Analysis proves that this all is done with the machines,using 3 wires to pull dome above which can be seen on the back of minarates.
If You think this analysis is wrong,please come forward with the proofs…
This Video is showing the movement of Dome,its being done by wires,the wires are not clearly visible due to bad camera and white back ground,in some parts the traces of wires are visible,which is shown in above pictures…
as you can see the wires which is very close to phone,is not visible in video.
This video is also not taken by the Trans 7 news Agency,becoz News Reporters can;t have such bad quality camera.
The Channel Trans 7 first time Aired this video,without any proof.
If the Incident is true,then why this news was not reported by Any other news agency,or in local newspapers ?

Advice to Muslim Brother and Sisters

Dear Brother and Sisters,
Please note that when ever you are sharing any content with your friends and family,then you must verify it ,Its True or False…I'm not saying these words,these are the commands of ALLAH SWT.

And do not follow (blindly) any information of which you have no (direct) knowledge. (Using your faculties of perception and conception, you must verify it for yourself. In the Court of your Lord,) you will be held accountable for your hearing, sight, and the faculty of reasoning." [Qu'ran 17:36]

On Internet there are many many lies,hoax,against Islam,we are trying very hard to clear all things,Then why you are sharing Un-Authorized contents with others.Lieing about Allah and Muhammad SAW will directly take you to hell.
so,please please please verify the content before sharing,Verses,Hadith,
Please help us to remove the fake things…and when ever you receive any thing claiming the MIRACLES OF ALLAH SWT OR MUHAMAMD SAW.
Put BIG Question mark on that miracle "?" becoz 90% images and videos spread on Internet is fake miracles…
If you can't verify it,then send it us,we will try our best to present the truth in front of you.
Now i think you must present the truth of dome flying to everyone,with whom you shared this lie… to erase the bad deeds which you gained without knowing the truth.
We don't need such kind of things to show the greatness and power of ALLAH SWT.
And Allah knows best!


JazakAllah khair for reading this ,
sharing is allowed with the proper source back link and without editing the Author name…
May Allah save us from all kind of Fitnah,
Ameen
Written by
King
slave of ALLAH SWT!

Let us know,What you think,What you were thinking before and what you think now…

Read More